Revised: October 5, 2009 @ 10:45am
Recently, I had the opportunity to listen to Barack Obama's powerful speech on the topic of health care in the US. Although the American President has many detractors with regard to this and other programmes, I am increasingly impressed with his actions, articulated through his words.
Unlike most politicians, his messages are clear, consistent and realistic, despite the often rhetorical stylistic positioning of the media and the opposition.
Most importantly, he has instilled a "sense of reason" and expressed the need for action - "now". In stressing these factors, he has managed to push special interest groups out of bounds or at least off centre stage. He is addressing issues that have been bounced around over the past century by almost every president on the election stump, items which generally die a rapid death shortly after elections are over. In the past, almost all US presidents have capitulated to vested interests, however Obama has made it patently clear that he will not follow that road. As is appropriate, he is insistent that the time to act on these issues is now and whereas solutions may be elusive and require time to achieve - a beginning is paramount. This appears to be his main focus and I concur with that sentiment entirely.
Last week, I had occasion to treat an ex-cabinet minister and impressed upon that individual the need for all politicians to address and resolve important issues, rather than speaking out of both sides of their mouths, while saying nothing. As most of us understand, politicians focus on the moment, i.e. the polls, getting elected, staying elected and doing what is expedient or politically correct. Moreover, they sometimes appear to be in political office only to pursue their own agendas, including generous pensions, prolonged vacations, extensive staffs and privileges, along with overly generous budgets for the purpose of self-indulgence.
Obama, in less than one year in office, has differentiated himself from the norm. Moreover, I am amazed by the energy and ongoing motion that he continually generates. As I frequently state to some of my co-workers, "to succeed, you must commit to your job, address issues, find solutions and implement them." That is the formula for success. Unfortunately, in my experience, less than 10% of the workforce adheres to this code and it is refreshing to see a leader do so, particularly at the highest level. I feel that this is the impetus that the US and the entire world needs and as a global figure - he will establish a standard for others. Leadership must not only be seen but heard and to pursue and complete important agendas, rather than engaging in endless, non-focused discussion, is critical.
During his address, Mr. Obama stressed certain items that previously seemed to be perpetually lost in the shuffle. One - that insurance companies should not be practicing medicine, i.e. making decisions regarding best practice decisions, once upon a time determined by properly trained medical consultants. Two - that insurance companies could no longer make inappropriate exclusions for treatment, which are arbitrarily established unilaterally and brook no protest from the victims.
These two items alone have in large part prevented adequate medical care being provided to patients over the last fifty or more years. That insurance companies by fiat and other questionable methods (control of the purse strings) are able to enforce self-interest rules, while governments idly stand by is outrageous; therein lie many of the problems in health care systems throughout the world, no matter who controls, provides or administers. Ideally, health care services should offer the best possible therapy for the patient's condition, to the exclusion of all other considerations. The Obama approach might not achieve that initially but will certainly be a major step in the right direction, one that has regressed significantly over the last twenty-five years, despite the plethora of technological advances.
As a final comment it should be noted that the increasing reaction to Obama's directives, most of which I deem appropriate, including the health care solution is typical of how unpopular the truth has become. Indeed, it appears to have become almost unpalatable. This is demonstrated daily in the media, the courts and the prevalent political forums. Often, what we know to be the truth is so distorted or even repudiated that falsehoods become the norm. As has been previously stated, "The lie oft repeated becomes the truth." Much of the opposition to Obama is based on that mentality and this too needs to change. Whereas I do not idolize individuals, I am still able to recognize the truth and will always support it. All those capable of thinking independently should be similarly inclined.
Comments (5)
I completely agree with Fred Kahn's view. I come from a UK perspective, where the government is "outsourcing" more and more of the "easy" and uncomplicated NHS work to the private sector. The problems that arise frequently - clinical and insurance cover problems respectively - then have to be bailed out by the NHS. All teaching and training, of course, is done in the NHS. Insurance based healthcare doesn't work!
Peter Herbert
Posted by Peter Herbert | October 7, 2009 10:34 AM
Posted on October 7, 2009 10:34
This man is a menace and a tyrant. Barack Obama can read a telepromter, but has taken our economy and destroyed much of the private sector with his czars and autocratic style. He took over the banks, mortage industry, car companies, etc., and now wants the heathcare system for his very own Christmas present!
If you say insurance companies should not play doctor, why should the government? Last time I looked, they have NO experience in medicine(or any kind of business, for that matter).
This bill will increase our insurance rates 30%, put insurance companies, doctors, and hospitals OUT of business, and carries fines and jail time for those citizens who don't participate as the government dictates. It taxes everything even remotely seen as a "medical device" (band aids, for instance), cuts and rations care, cuts and regulates doctor income and their treatment choices, requies older citizens to undergo "end of life counselling", and controls EVERYTHING every citizen does! It is a huge government power grab that is unconstitutional, unAmerican, and tyrranical!
If the insurance companies should stay out of our health care decisions, so should the government AND Barack Obama.
Posted by Jeff Graham | December 22, 2009 2:40 PM
Posted on December 22, 2009 14:40
To: Peter Herbert
Dear Peter:
Many thanks for your comment on my article on President Obama’s position. Even though he is receiving a great deal of criticism his key position regarding insurance companies is one that needs to be addressed. To the best of my knowledge he is the first individual that has made a point of that issue and this is extremely important.
To: Jeffrey Graham
Dear Jeff:
Many thanks for your comment regarding my article on President Obama. I agree with most of the things that you have stated and understand that governments are rarely instrumental in improving a situation. If he takes on the insurance companies and defeats them, that will be a singular achievement regardless of all other aspects of his strategy. Until the problem posed by the insurance companies is resolved, healthcare cannot improve.
Yours Sincerely,
Fred Kahn, M.D., F.R.C.S.(C)
Posted by Dr. Fred Kahn | December 31, 2009 11:38 AM
Posted on December 31, 2009 11:38
It seems that it's the government meddling in insurance, in addition to the legal system, that caused the healthcare problem in the first place. Defeating private industry such as insurance companies will only raise costs, reduce quality of care and access, and ultimately destroy the system.
Tort reform will drastically lower costs, reform of some insurance regulations to allow purchase accross state lines and portability would improve access, and changing the way insurance is purchased would make a huge difference as well. After all, my employer doesn't buy my car, house, or the insurance for those items, and I don't insure my car tires, battery, and wipers. Why do we do it differently for health care? The whole idea of going in and having treatment with no other financial responsiblity other than a cheap insurance policy is unsustainable.
Posted by Jeff Graham | January 5, 2010 3:11 PM
Posted on January 5, 2010 15:11
Dear Jeff:
In response to your recent communication, I think we need to get back to the basics, i.e. a proper educational system and the infusion of morals into our younger generation, in order to change the axiom of how can I get the most for my services, for doing the least.
I think these are the basic problems: Insurance companies taking premiums but being obstructive compensating patients for the reasons they paid for the insurance, to me has always been a major impediment to good health care. I do not disagree that most governments are largely useless and spend ridiculous amounts of money on stupidities. That will not change until we change the system of government. I agree with all of your comments and it is just a matter of the method to be applied to fix all these inequities.
Sincerely,
Fred Kahn, M.D. F.R.C.S.(C)
Posted by Dr. Fred Kahn | January 14, 2010 9:12 AM
Posted on January 14, 2010 09:12